> This one isn't surprising at all: it doesn't deal with letters, but symbols. It’s not surprising to us now. It was very surprising to me when I first noticed

> This one isn't surprising at all: it doesn't deal with letters, but symbols. It’s not surprising to us now. It was very surprising to me when I first noticed it, as it contrasted sharply with ChatGPT’s ability to explain aspects of language that seem to us humans as being much more difficult, particularly word meaning. > Can you give me an example of the query you're asking? I have to admit that all of my testing of its grammar-explaining ability was done last December. I have repeated a few of those tests now with GPT-4, and it did fine [1]. [1] https://www.gally.net/temp/202212chatgpt/explaininggrammar.html https://www.gally.net/temp/202212chatgpt/explaininggrammar.h...