4 ms·
Y'know, it's one thing to be against laws that are ostensibly made in favor of prosecuting child pornography because they can be abused to censor things that ar
by DannoHung 15y ago
Y'know, it's one thing to be against laws that are ostensibly made in favor of prosecuting child pornography because they can be abused to censor things that are politically unpopular... it's a whole other bucket of beans to be against removing stuff that's basically child pornography because you think something that's politically unpopular might be removed.
- jquery 15y ago> basically child pornography Nothing that got banned was "basically child pornography." That's why there is blood in the water.
- DannoHung 15y agoIt was a collection of subreddits for the purpose of eroticism focused on children. It wasn't child porn, but it's as close as you can come without actually getting arrested. You're full of shit if you're trying to tell me otherwise.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ghani 15y agoThe subreddits are as close as you can get to being illegal, but I think there's still a large (or at least significant) difference between the two. My only basis for that is my gut reaction, but I think it was what jquery was getting at. Not that they're truly unrelated.