Yes, I think this explains a lot of skeptics. They look at ChatGPT as an information repository, as so it is impressive but flawed, while looking right past its

Yes, I think this explains a lot of skeptics. They look at ChatGPT as an information repository, as so it is impressive but flawed, while looking right past its incredible facility with language which is positively superhuman. Some humans can exceed its language skills on some details, but no one can speak so many languages (both natural and programming languages) with the ease and facility of ChatGPT.