4 ms·
Good. Wayland is ready. Any GPU/DE that hasn't fully supported Wayland should be abandoned at this point.
by awill 3y ago
Good. Wayland is ready. Any GPU/DE that hasn't fully supported Wayland should be abandoned at this point.
- slondr 3y agoThere’s more than just KDE and Gnome out there, you know. There’s dozens of WMs that have no Wayland equivalent, and at this point seems like they never will. I use Xmonad at work. I doubt we’ll ever see a Wayland port of StumpWM.
- ollien 3y agoXFCE doesn't even fully support Wayland...
- BaculumMeumEst 3y agoregarding stumpwm: https://github.com/stumpwm/mahogany https://github.com/stumpwm/mahogany also another cool project: https://sr.ht/~shunter/wayflan/ https://sr.ht/~shunter/wayflan/
- slondr 3y agoIt seems like they’re in the process of rewriting it into C? That seems like it would defeat what I found to be the most compelling aspect of Stump, but I’ll likely try it out to see for myself.
- femiagbabiaka 3y agoRewriting the backend into C. Writing C in 2023 is a weird choice for sure, but the clisp frontend code seems like it's going to be staying.
- Nullabillity 3y agoAnd before anyone suggests Sway, its multihead support is so laughably bad compared to Xmonad that it makes you wonder if anyone ever tried to use it.
- bee_rider 3y agoThat’s interesting, i3 wm has perfectly decent multihead support, and usually Sway matches it at least.
- arp242 3y agoPeople should be doing whatever works well for them and makes them productive and happy. If that's Wayland then that's Wayland. If that's Xorg then that's Xorg. People going around the internet telling other people what they should be doing with their spare time and private computer should mind their own business.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y ago> Any GPU/DE that hasn't fully supported Wayland should be abandoned at this point. Sure thing. I'll just send you the bill for the new hardware, shall I?