4 ms·
I worked at Coinbase until very recently and can confirm this is Coinbase They paid upfront for 3 years of usage, and yes they were burning > $20m/year on data
by coinbasethrow 3y ago
I worked at Coinbase until very recently and can confirm this is Coinbase
They paid upfront for 3 years of usage, and yes they were burning > $20m/year on datadog
- skippyboxedhero 3y agoDear Lord...the commission on that hog. The sales team eating good.
- austhrow743 3y agoI was previously in sales and SaaS is considered the pinnacle of industries to be in for sales people. Medical device sales is the only real competitor when it comes to earning potential and my understanding is that's US specific and also comes with atrocious work life balance.
- thinkmassive 3y agoSo you’re saying it’s $65 million over three years? The headline seems misleading, like it’s for a single month.
- KaiserPro 3y agoyes but 20 million dollars a year. 20 fucking million getting splunk with 1pb a month ingest isnt that expensive.
- rednerrus 3y agoThey'll probably throw in SignalFX for free if you ask them nicely.
- quickthrower2 3y agoPlease tell me I am allowed to say "you could just use grep and rsync". I must be allowed!
- KaiserPro 3y agobut only if you have "as-a-service" attached to the end of it. or something with chatgpt
- coinbasethrow 3y agoHeadline is slightly misleading Earnings call said it was an upfront cost
- johnvanommen 3y agoBack in the day I was auditing our support contracts for a place that I worked at. Basically figuring out if we were getting what we were paying for. My favorite "overpriced support contract" was for an Oracle product. The cost of support was seven figures, and in the entire year a single phone call had been placed to support.
- re-thc 3y agoDid that end up being a “support” call where they sold you more services?
- Macha 3y agoThe best bit when I worked at one of those companies that had an expensive Oracle contract was this dynamic: 1. Can we use MySQL for <new product>? No, use Oracle, we have a support contract 2. <oracle related issue occurs> Can we call that support contract in now? No, let's try the inhouse expertise first. 3. <inhouse expertise comes up with barely passable hack> Can we check if they have any better solutions? No, it's "solved" now Like, what were we paying for? I have to assume there's per-engagement costs as well as the ongoing costs, given how hestitant our contract owning team were to let us anywhere near Oracle.
- paulddraper 3y ago> 3 years Okay, it seemed like it was 1 year. So, only insane, not insane^2.