3 ms·
Interspecies violence is one of a ton of proposed theories, and not a lot of evidence exists to suggest favoring one over the other. See https://en.wikipedia.o
by btilly 4y ago
Interspecies violence is one of a ton of proposed theories, and not a lot of evidence exists to suggest favoring one over the other.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_extinction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_extinction for some of the other theories.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI thought there was some decent evidence including butcher marks on bones and widespread genetic immunity to human specific prions
- btilly 4y agoThat's evidence that the Neanderthals engaged in cannibalism. That's not evidence that homo sapiens ate the Neanderthals as food.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think the genetic evidence is adaptive mutations that are present in all humans
- btilly 4y agoOur species also engaged in cannibalism. That isn't evidence that we killed the Neanderthals for food. Rather than, say, having added some ecosystem stress through competition that left them less able to handle a major volcano 40,000 years ago.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think that if human practiced widespread and consistent cannibalism, then it stands that we likely ate Neanderthals and other homo species to some degree
- usrusr 4y agoGiven our recent performance in extinction level interspecies violence and our considerable capability of intraspecies violence I find your characterization of violence as only one of many competing theories surprisingly ... endearing. But you are not wrong, given the low populations involved on both sides it's not impossible at all that violence wasn't the decisive factor.