3 ms·
Are you a PHD level AI researcher? If not, I don't think you are the intended audience. I'm not, so as a reader here, I'm just happy that I didn't have to pay
by lbotos 3y ago
Are you a PHD level AI researcher? If not, I don't think you are the intended audience.
I'm not, so as a reader here, I'm just happy that I didn't have to pay to get exposed to new challenging ideas. A lot of other science is sadly paywalled inside of journals.
Give it a few weeks for the fast followers to dumb it down for us.
- toxik 3y agoI am, yes. Most of our field’s research is publicly available on arxiv by the way.
- yorwba 3y agoIndeed, the paper associated with the blog post is also on arXiv. But how does that relate to your complaint?
- mrtranscendence 3y agotoxik was responding to the apparent position that it's OK for the material to be presented in a confusing way, because the research has been provided freely rather than locked behind a paywall. It's apropos to point out that this isn't a great excuse.
- tmabraham 3y agoOkay, but are you a diffusion model/generative AI researcher? As a researcher in this field, I found the article fairly understandable and accessible. I suspect that was the target audience. The domain of diffusion models have a lot of terminology and concepts that are not explained here, so maybe that's why it's harder to understand?