4 ms·
Cool cynical take, bro. It's almost like rashly hiring a lot of "unneeded workers" and then firing them is an indication they won't be able to return money to s
by garbagecoder 3y ago
Cool cynical take, bro. It's almost like rashly hiring a lot of "unneeded workers" and then firing them is an indication they won't be able to return money to shareholders.
German companies of a certain size have to have worker representation on their boards. Since Germany is perhaps one of the world's leading economies and hasn't been destroyed by not only returning money to shareholders, there is, at least, a viable alternative.
But please continue to embody why we can't have nice things.
- benatkin 3y agoNot even a cool cynical take. It fails to take into account that Intel has taken tax incentives for providing jobs. They might be justified in what they're doing here and it might be mostly unrelated to these tax incentives, but they certainly don't have zero obligation to provide jobs. https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/intel https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/intel