4 ms·
This doesn’t seem unreasonable. Isn’t this already the case for politicians in the US? (Not related to deepfakes, just any public statement). Wouldn’t any legal
by noughtme 3y ago
This doesn’t seem unreasonable. Isn’t this already the case for politicians in the US? (Not related to deepfakes, just any public statement). Wouldn’t any legal matters defer to written contracts and TOS?
- TeMPOraL 3y agoIndeed. Given the current state of affairs, I think if anyone were to be a victim of a deepfake smear campaing, Musk is easily in top 10 of the most likely candidates.
- taylodl 3y agoYes, there are downsides to being a dick and trolling the world and thinking it's funny. Who'da thunk it?
- ceejayoz 3y agoMusk is welcome to say "that's a deep fake, I never said that". He can't say "because I'm the target of deep fakes, you can't use any video evidence against me".
- falcolas 3y agoThen let Musk hire an expert who can act as a witness. Let the prosecution do the same. AKA - how technical concerns like this are already argued in court. Photoshop, videos with doubles, and other such impersonation issues have been a thing for a long time, and the courts have found ways to deal with them.
- nh23423fefe 3y agomaking up numbers isn't persuasive.
- taylodl 3y agoIt's very unreasonable when the actual person makes the actual statement. You know how people keep saying contracts aren't worth the paper they're written on? You know what's one of the things making your contract and TOS practically worthless? Your public statements. What you say matters. A lot.