That was essentially my thoughts. I have had what OP built and I have had it for about 2 decades now. It is called an RSS reader. OP's problem statement is exac

That was essentially my thoughts. I have had what OP built and I have had it for about 2 decades now. It is called an RSS reader. OP's problem statement is exactly why RSS readers are so amazing. It also means I can aggregate content from all my sites into one place. This tech has been around forever but has fallen out of favor, yet still supported by every major site. Just like how kids now are realizing the fun of film cameras and instant Polaroids as an alternative to digital photography, I keep hoping that a similar renaissance for RSS (or an alternative feed format) comes into vogue again. It really was a superior internet. The benefit of feed readers is that you are just aggregating original content that is still owned by the original owners. In OP's scenario they are violating copyright law with their site by using ChatGPT to read TechCrunch and regurgitate it onto their own site. This is textbook copyright fraud, and for those shouting "fair use", this wouldn't qualify because it is designed as a replacement to the original. After reading OP's site, I have no need for going to Techcrunch, which makes it no longer fair use. If OP was quoting (with citations) and commentating on techcrunch's article then that would be fair use.