3 ms·
> do people actually understand what [AGI] means no because it means something different to each person (both its definition and its implications)
by ftxbro 3y ago
> do people actually understand what [AGI] means
no because it means something different to each person (both its definition and its implications)
- greyman 3y agoExactly. For example John Carmack understands AGI as an simulation of 2-year old human brain, which we can teach anything. That's quite a good definition imo, but it seems to me this isn't achievable by evolution of LLMs. Other people thinks that by making current LLMs approach somewhat better, that could be called AGI. To sum it up, AGI isn't anything specific at this point.