Well, I guess two things: 1. Sam's point is that if you are going for a poison-antidote, you probably don't have time to shop around and will go anywhere becau

Well, I guess two things: 1. Sam's point is that if you are going for a poison-antidote, you probably don't have time to shop around and will go anywhere because you are price inelastic at that point. It's not a real scenario, but in that situation of course we shouldn't allow pharmacists to just charge whatever they think they can get away with to extort the most money from someone who is dying of a poison. Is this point really up for debate, or are we really saying that should be allowed behaviour? 2. It wouldn't be facism regardless.