2 ms·
To avoid the proliferation of a million different licenses, it would be better to have a single or few "No GitHub" licenses. Such a license would not be consid
by suprjami 3y ago
To avoid the proliferation of a million different licenses, it would be better to have a single or few "No GitHub" licenses.
Such a license would not be considered "open" by the OSI because it imposes onerous conditions.
Even if they were made, I wonder how much such licenses would be used. If the permissive people don't like copyleft because of the conditions it imposes, they must hate this. Likewise the copyleft folks want freedom enforced, not taken away.