4 ms·
So far it does not. I have not pushed it though because I'm making my own 3D engine to go with the backend: http://talk.binarytask.com/task?id=5959519327505901
by bullen 3y ago
So far it does not.
I have not pushed it though because I'm making my own 3D engine to go with the backend: http://talk.binarytask.com/task?id=5959519327505901449 http://talk.binarytask.com/task?id=5959519327505901449
That said, I think it's the only way forward.
Both the tech and the license needs openness.
Unfortunately open-source means free forever, while "source available" got the backseat and allows money to be involved.
Not explicitly but indirectly through "you can just download and compile it yourself" for "free".
This is also an incentive to make build systems opaque, another trend I have noticed.
Eventually compiling something will take weeks and months to setup. XD
- auggierose 3y agoYes, there is a logical error contained in "open core". The incentives are just not aligned properly, so stuff like opaque build systems does not really surprise me.