3 ms·
sure taken separately that looks more elegant. but, provided your whole program is complex enough, i think if you take a step back your language of choice is go
by medo-bear 3y ago
sure taken separately that looks more elegant. but, provided your whole program is complex enough, i think if you take a step back your language of choice is gonna look like a pigs sty compared to the same thing written in common lisp.
i think the amazing thing about common lisp as a high level language is that it can be a low language also. imo it is an unmatched balance of a high/low level language
- foldr 3y agoAre there any examples of elegant CL code that performs lots of vector geometry calculations? I'm skeptical that this sort of code would come out elegantly in CL (at least if it had to perform reasonably well).
- reikonomusha 3y agoThis isn't a direct answer to your question (it's not a computational geometry codebase), but one option for implementing geometry might be to use MAGICL. [1] It is optionally and transparently accelerated by BLAS/LAPACK. [1] https://github.com/quil-lang/magicl/blob/master/doc/high-level.md https://github.com/quil-lang/magicl/blob/master/doc/high-lev...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]