4 ms·
>The way to do it legally is to have 1 person read the code wasn't it to have one person run tests of what happened when different things were done, and then w
by bryanrasmussen 4y ago
>The way to do it legally is to have 1 person read the code
wasn't it to have one person run tests of what happened when different things were done, and then write up a document describing the functionality?
In other words I think one person reading the code is still in violation?
- nordsieck 4y ago> Typically, a clean-room design is done by having someone examine the system to be reimplemented and having this person write a specification. This specification is then reviewed by a lawyer to ensure that no copyrighted material is included. The specification is then implemented by a team with no connection to the original examiners. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
- bryanrasmussen 4y agoyes, reading that description it seems pretty clear to me that they did not read the code but they had access to the working system and then >by reverse engineering and then recreating it without infringing any of the copyrights associated with the original design. reverse engineering is not 'reading the code'.