3 ms·
Again I could be a massive idiot, but as I see it? For certain things yes 100%. When it comes to low level things, currently an LLM has no way to confirm behavi
by gwoolhurme 3y ago
Again I could be a massive idiot, but as I see it? For certain things yes 100%. When it comes to low level things, currently an LLM has no way to confirm behavior of something that doesn't give feedback. The FairPlay example I gave requires you to actually play a video with DRM. Another example I can think of are debouncing buttons on a microcontroller based device. As a super basic example but if you are working on an IoT device and require to know when a pin needs to be debounced, that can only sometimes be found under an oscilloscope. However an open source device could be policed with human-to-human interaction. In fact, I have done so making a PR a long long time ago for a crypto wallet that was open sourced. There are all anecdotal examples, I still see a need for at some level a human to enter the loop, however in a disaster scenario if it becomes unviable to run sites like SO then you slowly lose hubs for that knowledge base.
- afarviral 3y agoI didn't consider that but its already begun with plugins and auto GPT. LLMs can test their hypothesis. Next, that might be possible via robotics... so scifi.