4 ms·
Oddly I'm not able to reply directly to re-thc, so I hope you don't mind me commenting here that - I suspect that they're not deploying with a CDK-defined Code
by scubbo 3y ago
Oddly I'm not able to reply directly to re-thc, so I hope you don't mind me commenting here that - I suspect that they're not deploying with a CDK-defined Code Pipeline (starter article[0], in-depth example[1]), which makes cross account/region deployments so ludicrously smooth and simple that it often has newbies refuse to believe that it can have worked _that_ easily.
It is true that _some_ resources don't have L2 constructs, but there's pretty damn good coverage of the most popular services - and, even when you have to drop back to L1, that's still better than hand-written CFN templates or abandoning IaC entirely!
[0] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/v2/guide/cdk_pipeline.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/v2/guide/cdk_pipeline.html
[1] https://pipelines.devops.aws.dev/ https://pipelines.devops.aws.dev/
- emodendroket 3y agoIf the reply link doesn't appear you can still reply by clicking on the timestamp. I don't know why it works that way.
- scubbo 3y agoOdd - it's showing up now. I'll remember for next time. Thanks!