Right, that was the first thing I looked at and I don’t understand the article author’s logic: compare performance to M2, then don’t compare the 25% lower power

Right, that was the first thing I looked at and I don’t understand the article author’s logic: compare performance to M2, then don’t compare the 25% lower power (admittedly stated) consumption. Just a super weird writing choice. Also puts to bed the “x86 is fundamentally unable to be as low power as arm” rationale for the poor intel and amd perf/watt. I think the sole reason for that is that they never _really_ competed on that metric.