4 ms·
The title doesn't seem to reflect the actual content: > They made her wait more than two months while they decided whether or not they were originally right ab
by fishtoaster 3y ago
The title doesn't seem to reflect the actual content:
> They made her wait more than two months while they decided whether or not they were originally right about the car being totaled. Maybe they were going to try to fix it.
So it sounds like Amazon was dragging their feet figuring out if they were going to pay for replacing a totaled car or pay for fixing a near-totaled car. Then a reporter got involved and the expedited it.
That doesn't exactly reflect well on Amazon, but it also doesn't sound like the headline ("they tried to not pay at all") was actually the case.
- civilized 3y agoIf they want to provide evidence that they were pushing a reasonable process forward I don't think there's anything stopping them. And for anyone who wants to know more about why this might happen - look into Delay, Deny, Defend, the strategy McKinsey proposed to help Allstate increase its profits.
- CydeWeys 3y agoTwo months is an awfully long time to go with no working car and no money to buy a new one. This could be a substantial hardship.
- btilly 3y agoAfter 2 months of waiting, it is a reasonable conclusion that they were hoping that if they just waited long enough, they would never have to pay. This certainly isn't the behavior that I'd expect out of a customer obsessed company like Amazon aims to be. Certainly someone failed miserably at the first leadership principle, Customer Obsession. https://www.amazon.jobs/content/en/our-workplace/leadership-principles https://www.amazon.jobs/content/en/our-workplace/leadership-...