> Unfortunately, I have to take this with a grain of salt, because this study wouldn’t have been published if it had found the opposite. This is pretty declara

> Unfortunately, I have to take this with a grain of salt, because this study wouldn’t have been published if it had found the opposite. This is pretty declarative and indicates a certainty on your part. Unfortunately, it is presented without the evidence that led to your certainty. > Could there be opposite-conclusion studies that were quashed? This sounds like a bias generated, leading question. However, nuance in text can be tricky. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, what did you see with this study that leads you to ask this?