3 ms·
There is a middle ground to this. Sooner or later you have to upgrade. There might be a security upgrade or the old system doesn't play nice with other systems.
by o_m 3y ago
There is a middle ground to this. Sooner or later you have to upgrade. There might be a security upgrade or the old system doesn't play nice with other systems. So you are forced to upgrade to something more non-boring, even if you are using the same tech. It also get harded to hire developers. I doubt there is many devs that want to work on Angular 2 these days.
- ThalesX 3y agoThe middle ground is that once the tech becomes the actual problem, it might be time to investigate possibilities, until then, customers don't care, business people doesn't care and the bottom line doesn't care. There are not that many companies in the world where the tech stack is their competitive advantage. > I doubt there is many devs that want to work on Angular 2 these days. From my experience, a product that makes money and is able to pay people at market rates, will find said people. Not everyone is an EMACS wielding, Linux wizard that refuses to touch tech out of idealistic concerns. The problem, in my experience, is more often lack of PMF than tech stack (I've seen customers give insane leeway to actually valuable products).