3 ms·
The desktop Ryzen 7000 parts are still saddled with power-hungry die-to-die interconnects and an IO die that's built on an older fab process (though not quite a
by wtallis 4y ago
The desktop Ryzen 7000 parts are still saddled with power-hungry die-to-die interconnects and an IO die that's built on an older fab process (though not quite as old as previous Ryzen IO dies), so the idle power is horrible. And the parts without the 3D stacked L3 cache will happily crank up the voltage to crazy levels in order to get the last few percent of clock speed. But if you cap their power/voltage/frequency to reasonable levels and look at the power consumed by just the CPU cores, it's clear that AMD has a very promising building block to use for their monolithic mobile processors.
But I agree that AMD's marketing claims as filtered through low-quality journalism that doesn't even distinguish between peak and base power consumption is a poor way to judge whether AMD has succeeded in building a great low-power processor.
- freehorse 4y agoWell I do not take any claims of any company seriously before I see actual reviews anyway, they usually just cherry pick what they want, so I do not specifically blame AMD for that. And yeah I agree, we run our new AMD desktops in eco mode at work, it was ridiculous to routinely get like 95C temperatures for whatever random chores. Once we used to overclock AMD cpus, nowadays we underclock them lol. I have not really checked how many watts it draws after we put them in eco mode though, I will do it next time.
- AshamedCaptain 4y agoAnd notebookcheck reports the idle power on the new gen of laptop chips is actually worse than on the previous gen.