The issue is that, for those that do work well remote, they're going to either have to sacrifice[0] by going hybrid or on-site to ensure they can enable team me

The issue is that, for those that do work well remote, they're going to either have to sacrifice[0] by going hybrid or on-site to ensure they can enable team members like yourself, or further limit their group of candidates to those who feel like they'll do well working remote[1]. 0: which is a big sacrifice, since even 2 day hybrid can mean spending tens of hours a month sitting in a car or on transit, not engaging in either productive or self-sustaining activity, and it actively limits where people can live, further propping up cities with housing supply issues due to single-family zoning and a lack of rent control. 1: Not to say this is you, but I can imagine many candidates saying "yes" / "I excel in remote and on-site" to "do you believe you'll be productive in a remote role" even if they aren't sure this is the case for them, in order to look qualified for every open position.