4 ms·

Not hypocritical at all, if you read the background story here: http://www.simondale.net/house/family.htm http://www.simondale.net/house/family.htm Initially w

Not hypocritical at all, if you read the background story here: http://www.simondale.net/house/family.htm http://www.simondale.net/house/family.htm Initially we had no capital and we had decided resolutely to be full time parents whilst our children were young. As you’ll appreciate to be a full time mum and part time dad our income is low, about £5,000 p.a, so a mortgage was not an option and the prospects for renting seemed grim. Providence came our way and a landowner offered us the chance to move to his woodland in west Wales to build an eco-house. There would be no formal security or long term ownership, but £2000 was available for materials, so we jumped at the idea without a backward glance. Sounds like just the sort of risk-taking, scrappy bootstrapping story that'd do well on HN, but everyone seems to be bagging it. ps. Scrap = things that other people are chucking away, or will have to pay to take away. Making use of it is a good thing.

dkhenry 15y ago
If it was presented as a scrappy bootstrapping story that would be one thing but the article's title is misleading in that it says it was only $5000 to build, which the actual cost was a lot more, the total expenditure was $5000 , but total coast of materials and labor puts it well above $5000. This is more what people were thinking. http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/1k-house-project.html http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/1k-house-project.html
- anthonyb 15y ago
  Which all seem to follow the exact same pattern, ie. only counting the cost of materials that you have to buy. From that link: The Soft Courtyard House This design draws heavily on bamboo, which is readily available in China... The Recycled Materials House As the name implies, this two-story structure uses locally- and regionally-available recycled materials, both to reduce costs and to promote sustainable housing practices. For example, fly ash residue from local coal-burning factories supplements the concrete medium and replaces the more expensive cement component. The composition of these L-shaped corner walls would be rammed earth and bamboo. In an innovative twist, the formwork that produces the rammed earth walls can be disassembled and then reassembled to create the roof. Not saying that these aren't all excellent ideas, but if the original article is 'misleading', then yours is too.

dkhenry 15y ago

If it was presented as a scrappy bootstrapping story that would be one thing but the article's title is misleading in that it says it was only $5000 to build, which the actual cost was a lot more, the total expenditure was $5000 , but total coast of materials and labor puts it well above $5000. This is more what people were thinking. http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/1k-house-project.html http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/1k-house-project.html

anthonyb 15y ago
Which all seem to follow the exact same pattern, ie. only counting the cost of materials that you have to buy. From that link: The Soft Courtyard House This design draws heavily on bamboo, which is readily available in China... The Recycled Materials House As the name implies, this two-story structure uses locally- and regionally-available recycled materials, both to reduce costs and to promote sustainable housing practices. For example, fly ash residue from local coal-burning factories supplements the concrete medium and replaces the more expensive cement component. The composition of these L-shaped corner walls would be rammed earth and bamboo. In an innovative twist, the formwork that produces the rammed earth walls can be disassembled and then reassembled to create the roof. Not saying that these aren't all excellent ideas, but if the original article is 'misleading', then yours is too.