Somewhat. I think if I was to ever use serverless for something it would be in concert with a traditional setup so in a way yes, you pay 2x the deployment compl

Somewhat. I think if I was to ever use serverless for something it would be in concert with a traditional setup so in a way yes, you pay 2x the deployment complexity because now you are orchestrating 2 environments. However if you have a usecase that is absolutely a perfect fit for serverless i.e incredibly bursty, unpredicable, very short runtime. To the point it would be to the detriment of other services hosted on the same infrastructure i.e would need say an isolated cluster anyway then yeah, serverless could be a cost worth paying.