3 ms·
It's fairly clear that the author was referring to the default configuration that JSLint ships with. Keep in mind that the original recommendation from the auth
by ryanbrunner 15y ago
It's fairly clear that the author was referring to the default configuration that JSLint ships with. Keep in mind that the original recommendation from the author JSLint was:
“There is one reliable, objective metric of JavaScript code quality that can help you in making your choice [… of library …]: JSLint. If JSLint finds problems in a library, then dump it and move on to the next one.”
This statement is fairly meaningless if it's reduced down to "if there's some set of configuration options to JSLint that allows this code to pass, then it's OK." Crockford clearly meant that people should evaluate library quality by the default configuration of JSLint.