3 ms·
He mentioned his routes files was 2500 lines long. That's probably the difference. Hopefully his blog post gives a wakeup call to the Rails core team that the
by jpcx01 18y ago
He mentioned his routes files was 2500 lines long. That's probably the difference.
Hopefully his blog post gives a wakeup call to the Rails core team that the mass inefficiency in the routing system needs to be fixed. Even if your routes file is 10,000 lines long, it shouldnt cause your app to bloat to a hundred megs of ram.
Comments on his blog post mentioned theres already a patch on the Rails lighthouse addressing this. Hopefully it makes it into 2.2