3 ms·
>Can you tell a quality scientific paper? Given the replication crisis, maybe scientific publishing as it works today also can't tell quality.
by j-bos 3y ago
>Can you tell a quality scientific paper?
Given the replication crisis, maybe scientific publishing as it works today also can't tell quality.
- VHRanger 3y agoThe replication crisis is much worse in fields without open publishing. Computer science/physics/etc. (arxiv), economics (NBER) and other fields with freely available papers tend to have much better replication numbers than fields that are closed-off. This is even better when data and code are publicly available.
- shishy 3y agoscite (where I work) makes understanding reproducibility much easier -- we have access to full text articles with agreements from publishers and are able to show you the statements from papers where each reference was used in text with the textual context, section, and a classification, so you can see if newer research indicated a difference in empirical findings, etc. Might be of interest for you is the only reason I'm bringing it up- https://scite.ai/home https://scite.ai/home