Okay. Then I think I see where you're coming from. From my perspective this was the mainly the first contact with the research presentation and the renderings,

Okay. Then I think I see where you're coming from. From my perspective this was the mainly the first contact with the research presentation and the renderings, and I think those are undeniably very impressive to most people at this point in time. But viewing it as a "Youtube value-add", or whatever the jargon for that phenomenon might be, I guess it's close at hand to judge it as poor, lazy work that doesn't do the original material justice. I will also admit it is something of a funny juxtaposition to have the photorealistic, high-definition graphics along with voiceover that is very obviously artificial.