4 ms·

Against googles lawyers? It would require a massive amount of pissed off consumers, and a huge team to even drag them to court. End result would be google pay

Against googles lawyers? It would require a massive amount of pissed off consumers, and a huge team to even drag them to court. End result would be google paying a pittance and no one getting anything. End of the day, a lot of lawyers would be paid well and google would shrug it off as a cost of business.

sirius87 3y ago
With all this talk of ChatGPT clearing law school exams and all, I'd love to see a legal fight of lawyers armed with AI against "googles lawyers". I believe that'd be a net good. For everyone else in tech, I suppose we can all vow to never purchase Google products as gifts for family.
- ceejayoz 3y ago
  Passing the exam doesn’t make you a good lawyer.
- fakedang 3y ago
  They cleared the exams, with barely passing scores though. In law, you can't paraphrase much - nuances in the law is everything when you're against the best lawyers that these tech giants would hire.
GavinMcG 3y ago
Class actions don't need a huge number of people to lead the charge. That's the point: most people can do nothing, while their interests are represented. I think it would be best if wrongdoers had to make consumers whole and also pay the costs of holding them accountable. But our system currently doesn't work that way, and in that context, it's still worthwhile to have lawyers motivated to raising the cost of wrongdoing.