3 ms·
Where are you seeing this? Everything I saw is that they are eligible for copyright, and the copyright is owned by the person who ran the tool and selected the
by Gigachad 4y ago
Where are you seeing this? Everything I saw is that they are eligible for copyright, and the copyright is owned by the person who ran the tool and selected the output.
The news was dumb media bait where people tried to claim the AI itself owned the copyright which makes no sense since AI is not a legal entity able to own things.
- evolve2k 4y agoJudge declared it about a month ago. Positon was the human edited parts were but machine generated parts were not. Sorry don’t have the reference at hand.
- Gigachad 4y agoSeems almost impossible to enforce. Say I generate an image, then go in photoshop and play with the levels/colors. Every single pixel was modified by me. And the only way you could use it without infringing on my copyright is to work out what the original image was, which is impossible.
- evolve2k 4y agoWe’ll if I then copied your work, onus would be on you to explain what you did beyond just promoting the engine with ‘astronaut on horse’.