3 ms·
Skimmed, it seems like exactly what the reader might have suspected. * More users on the 5G sites dragging that greenfield under-used speed mark down to the mo
by mjevans 3y ago
Skimmed, it seems like exactly what the reader might have suspected.
* More users on the 5G sites dragging that greenfield under-used speed mark down to the more typical value.
* Much of the hype 'best' with extremely high HZ spectrum that has short distance and low penetration E.G. Mostly giant sports stadiums.
* Suburbs and rural areas not a good match for the distance (frequency use) or capital investment required.
- hedora 3y agoRural coverage is the only problem I had with 4G, even living in the city, etc. These days, the land line phone company has abandoned our area, and the cell companies carpet bomb us for unlimited 5G home internet service that doesn’t exist near us (despite the fact that we get a 5G connection at home). So, it is starlink for us. Count me as unimpressed with 5G. I wish they’d focus on better geographic coverage and more reliable coverage instead.