4 ms·
It’s hilarious, but in this case I think it doesn’t apply. There is next to zero content here that is actually contributed by the person who made the video, and
by low_tech_love 3y ago
It’s hilarious, but in this case I think it doesn’t apply. There is next to zero content here that is actually contributed by the person who made the video, and the voice over is pretty horrible. But it did get to front page so maybe I’m just wrong!
- etiam 3y agoOkay. Then I think I see where you're coming from. From my perspective this was the mainly the first contact with the research presentation and the renderings, and I think those are undeniably very impressive to most people at this point in time. But viewing it as a "Youtube value-add", or whatever the jargon for that phenomenon might be, I guess it's close at hand to judge it as poor, lazy work that doesn't do the original material justice. I will also admit it is something of a funny juxtaposition to have the photorealistic, high-definition graphics along with voiceover that is very obviously artificial.