4 ms·
It's actually not in there, but in one of the sources quoted. > 4 Techniques for measuring altitude : Altitude measurements seem to have been made with a choro
by oh_sigh 3y ago
It's actually not in there, but in one of the sources quoted.
> 4 Techniques for measuring altitude : Altitude measurements seem to have been made with a chorobates, a primitive leveller with a vessel for water, or forerunners of this instrument. Eupalinos probably measured the south and independently the north entrances more than to check once his between results and to obtain a higher level of accuracy. He would have chosen a flat path around the mountain following a contour line not necessarily on the same level as the entrances. When the two parts meet in the tunnel after three km, the closing error of the levelling is small, only a few decimetres and the accuracy is still better at the entrances. Eupalinos had probably arranged two stone blocks at each entrance, with flat and levelled top surfaces, aligned with the tunnels, from which the level of the floor of the tunnel could be guided. Possibly a movable wooden pole was used to level it with the surface of the two outer stone blocks. Further into the tunnels lines on the walls seem to have taken over the role of the outer stones. Eupalinos himself seems to have expected a somewhat less precise result as he raised the ceiling of the north tunnel by 2.5 m and lowered the floor of the south tunnel by 0.6 m, when approaching the meeting point.
- colanderman 3y ago> the closing error of the levelling is small, only a few decimetres I guess "millimeters" in the article is in error. Decimeters is much more believable.
- ReactiveJelly 3y agoI'm behind Tor, but anyone else in this comment thread could fix the Wikipedia article