4 ms·
an authenticity checkmark for email? simple yet effective. wow it took us way too long to arrive at this answer (laugh+cry)
by cushpush 3y ago
an authenticity checkmark for email? simple yet effective. wow it took us way too long to arrive at this answer (laugh+cry)
- jimmaswell 3y agoDoes gmail not already reject mail without valid SPF/DKIM?
- hedora 3y agoThese stories about gmail fixing problems I haven’t had for 20 years are starting to remind me of the days when n00bz would install dozens of browser toolbars on their Win 95 machines.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- brightball 3y agoPayPal did a lot of research on trust indicators and determined they make no difference since you’re still going to trust plenty of mail without them. But if the BIMI carrot gets people to properly adopt DMARC I’m all for it.
- galaxyLogic 3y ago> you’re still going to trust plenty of mail Maybe. But maybe people have by now learned that there is lots of junk mail not worth opening. I personally don't answer the phone any more unless the caller is on my contacts list. I do the same for email, although some of them I read. But with this new feature I would have a clear rule, don't even open it unless it comes from verified address. This new feature would mean I have 3 types of incoming emails: 1. Mail from people in my contacts list 2. Mail from people who are not in my contacts-list but who are verified by Google. 3. Everything else, is junk