3 ms·
It helps some humans (those using AI and selling AI services) and hurts some (everyone else). For added irony many from the second group is who mostly produced
by throwaway290 4y ago
It helps some humans (those using AI and selling AI services) and hurts some (everyone else). For added irony many from the second group is who mostly produced content on which AI is trained.
- CamperBob2 4y agoIt helps some humans (those using AI and selling AI services) and hurts some (everyone else). Gonna throw up a nice big [Citation Needed] flag on that one. A rising tide lifts all boats in the end. All of them. No exceptions.
- throwaway290 4y agoCitation needed on whether it is that kind of rising tide. I think ML use should be regulated until economy is adapted with UBI or something. Benefit eventually does not justify unnecessary suffering now. Maybe in countries with stronger employment protections fewer people will be affected, but the topic is about US workers
- CamperBob2 4y agoI think ML use should be regulated until economy is adapted with UBI or something You're putting the cart before the horse. ML is what will enable UBI. In the best of all possible worlds, we will look back on our present economy a hundred years from now and shudder, just as we currently do when the conversation turns to company towns and antebellum plantations. That won't happen unless something changes, and... well, here we are, watching it change. If zero-sum gamers in government don't "regulate" ML to death first, that is.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]