2 ms·
>I said the majority of them were illegal. Right, so how many of them have you looked at to make that judgement? And perhaps more importantly, isn't it slight
by corin_ 15y ago
>I said the majority of them were illegal.
Right, so how many of them have you looked at to make that judgement?
And perhaps more importantly, isn't it slightly problematic (or at least odd) when a large number of people are justifying the ban by calling this material illegal... and to be able to argue that they must, surely, have committed the crime of viewing child pornography online themselves? (Keeping in mind that, when it comes to child pornography laws, viewing is very much a crime - it's not like witnessing a murder.)
- ceol 15y ago>Right, so how many of them have you looked at to make that judgement? Enough to determine there was no intent to post legal content. >And perhaps more importantly, isn't it slightly problematic (or at least odd) when a large number of people are justifying the ban by calling this material illegal... and to be able to argue that they must, surely, have committed the crime of viewing child pornography online themselves? A large number of people are saying this material wasn't illegal. They must surely have viewed it themselves, as well. Where does that get us?