3 ms·
(The sibling comments are good but I want to add this anyway) Wikipedia has a static test image for gamma here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gamma_correct
by ReactiveJelly 3y ago
(The sibling comments are good but I want to add this anyway)
Wikipedia has a static test image for gamma here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gamma_correction_test_picture.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gamma_correction_test_pic...
If you look in the green section, you can see the background is a checkerboard of (0, 0, 0) black and (0, 255, 0) green. Because of gamma, this is not equivalent to (0, 127, 0).
The 2.6, 2.2, 1.8 sections are supposed to blend with the background if that's the gamma that your image-to-screen pipeline uses. (Including the browser's PNG decoder, the browser's painting and compositing, the desktop's painting and compositing, anything goofy the GPU drivers do, and all the goofy stuff monitors do)
Looks like my cheapo 2010 LCD's gamma changes greatly depending on viewing angle. Ugh :S
- panzi 3y agoFunny thing: When I view that image and zoom in on my 4k monitor it is somehow interpolated. I have a bookmarklet that sets the style `image-rendering: pixelated` and when I click that it suddenly gets much brighter. That interpolation doesn't just look ugly blurry, it corrupts the colors. Maybe instead of using a bookmarklet I should put that into a user style applied to all websites. The bookmarklet for anyone who is interested: javascript:void(document.body.style.imageRendering='pixelated')