5 ms·
The present tense is fine in this case. The author means “composed of” and “consists of” are better phrases to use in general (i.e. according to style guides),
by bluepod4 3y ago
The present tense is fine in this case.
The author means “composed of” and “consists of” are better phrases to use in general (i.e. according to style guides), not were better phrases exclusively for use on his Wikipedia project. We know this for sure because in the “Quotations” section the author says that he changes “comprised of” to “composed of” or “comprises” in quotations under certain circumstances. He is not wary of using “comprises”.
The author also indicates that this work is still ongoing and meant to be evergreen.
- lolinder 3y agoI'm pretty sure it's a joke: those were better alternatives but they're equally valid now and it's time for the author to let the language change and move on.
- bluepod4 3y agoYeah, I see that now. Instead of italicizing the word “were” to place emphasis like you did, OP italicized most of the quote and not the word that needed emphasis. Ha. For this reason, I thought his “ATM clout” statement meant the opposite of what he meant.