3 ms·
absolutely wrong approach. fix this at the carrier level and not client device level.
by netik 3y ago
absolutely wrong approach. fix this at the carrier level and not client device level.
- petesergeant 3y agoI think you might be right here, but what does that look like exactly? Stop companies distributing cheap SIMs? Force them to get ID from any customer?
- fathyb 3y agoMaybe a standarized national system to report spam, or maybe even as part of the cellular protocol? I never heard of such a system deployed nationally, but I'm wondering if it could help. Most of the time when a spam number calls me, I can find it through spam reports on 3rd party websites by googling it.
- NoZebra120vClip 3y ago> Most of the time when a spam number calls me, I can find it through spam reports on 3rd party websites by googling it. Oh, you mean that you can identify the Caller ID number which the spammer chose to spoof at you?
- fathyb 3y agoNo, it seems most spammers here use cheap SIMs without spoofing (which seems to be what OP is about). They even leave voicemail messages asking to call back. But spoofing is also something that should be fixed. I know it's difficult because of VoIP and backwards-compatibility, but it's not impossible either.
- DANmode 3y ago> Maybe a standarized national system to report spam, or maybe even as part of the cellular protocol? Not government, but, forwarding spam texts to 7726 (SPAM) works for various carriers.
- Nextgrid 3y agoYou're forgetting that 1) carriers have near-zero engineering capability to fix this and 2) don't actually have an incentive to prevent spam/fraud because fraudulent traffic still pays them money. This is not about stopping fraud, this is about preventing "grey routes" that do arbitrage around tariffs and bypass carriers' outdated business model.