Regardless of the merits of the material and its author, I think the primary site, if anything, should be used. If you find this valuable/entertaining enough t

Regardless of the merits of the material and its author, I think the primary site, if anything, should be used. If you find this valuable/entertaining enough to read then read it at the original URL. If you find the author vile and/or the material not worth the time, linking to a ripped off copy of it doesn't make things better.