3 ms·
Oh, I read AND but was doing OR. My mistake. > Still I suspect the solution would hit the wall because e.g. sets would be too big therefore the program would t
by philh 15y ago
Oh, I read AND but was doing OR. My mistake.
> Still I suspect the solution would hit the wall because e.g. sets would be too big therefore the program would take actual ages to run, but one can surely hope?
I suspect something will go wrong, and this seems to me the obvious place for it to fail. But I expect it to fail mostly based on "if it was that easy, someone would probably have noticed", not because I have any particular insight into the problem.
- guard-of-terra 15y agoI have a same gut feeling, but one of my professors told us how the discoveries are being made: Everybody know that some thing is impossible to do. But one person who didn't know that accidentally does it. Right now I have one type-1 set having 36 numbers in it. The first numbers are 7, 25 and 42. I like it.