4 ms·
> Being on a dating or hookup app is evidence of temptation, but in itself no more than that. This could be true, merely having an application doesn't mean som
by TheFreim 3y ago
> Being on a dating or hookup app is evidence of temptation, but in itself no more than that.
This could be true, merely having an application doesn't mean someone is continuing on to do other things. The problem is that a priest isn't understood in a Catholic context merely be a private person. Publicly going on one of these "dating" applications and identifying oneself in such a manner lends itself towards the sin of scandal among other issues.
> I do wonder if any of the priests were on these apps to try to identify any other priests who were on there, not because they themselves were gay.
This would need need to be considered, but it seems unlikely. First, this idea is highly unlikely since without data analysis (which was done by the group discussed iirc) you're essentially exposing yourself to material you find objectionable go a goal that has minimal practical likelihood of being successful. On top of that, the kind of priest who would want to expose bad behavior isn't the kind of person who would ever considering using these applications. Also, if my memory serves me from when I first heard about this, data/information was simply referred to the relevant bishop who in turn would choose if/how to proceed.
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoI definitely understand why other commenters here are opposed to this, but I also understand why you and like-minded commenters find this a good thing. I hope those bishops respond appropriately. Thanks for the comment.