3 ms·

In the USA. For interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light . The second last paragraph comments on SF.

by zeagle 3y ago

CPLX 3y ago
Very interesting. The concept has been soundly rejected in the US. Except for San Francisco. How’s that working out?
- jfoutz 3y ago
  I think NYC is king of sunlight regulation https://www.nyc.gov/assets/oec/technical-manual/08_Shadows_2014.pdf https://www.nyc.gov/assets/oec/technical-manual/08_Shadows_2...
  - quitit 3y ago
    The inclusion of a solar-study to prove adherence to shadow regulation is a standard part of most types of development applications, not just in the USA but around the world. This kind of build out is regulated for many reasons: property damage, aesthetics, health, and with a renewed focus: energy use. This includes casting shadows over one’s own property.
  - CPLX 3y ago
    I mean actually read it. It basically says shadows don’t really matter much and you barely need to worry about them and then goes on to spell out in very clear detail what happens when they do matter so there don’t have to be moronic lawsuits every time someone wants to build a low rise apartment building.
    - garbagewoman 3y ago
      Not sure who you think you’re arguing with
    - jfoutz 3y ago
      I'm not sure I understand - https://sfplanning.org/resource/shadow-analysis-procedures-and-scope-requirements https://sfplanning.org/resource/shadow-analysis-procedures-a... 40 feet, times of year, 20% shadow. make a model. At the surface level, they look similar to me. NYC has been doing that for a whole lot longer, I wouldn't doubt their planning department has a more refined process. But it's not like SF is alone in this kind of regulation.
      - bobthepanda 3y ago
        My understanding is that NYC * has smaller time requirements for sunlight; the planning requirements state that an area should have 4-6 hours of sunlight a day, whereas SF looks at if it gets any worse over any time period * NYC only protects specific kinds of park uses for sunlight, so like sunlight is not material for a basketball court, for example.

In the USA. For interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light . The second last paragraph comments on SF.

by zeagle 3y ago

In the USA. For interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_light . The second last paragraph comments on SF.

CPLX 3y ago

Very interesting. The concept has been soundly rejected in the US. Except for San Francisco. How’s that working out?

jfoutz 3y ago
I think NYC is king of sunlight regulation https://www.nyc.gov/assets/oec/technical-manual/08_Shadows_2014.pdf https://www.nyc.gov/assets/oec/technical-manual/08_Shadows_2...
- quitit 3y ago
  The inclusion of a solar-study to prove adherence to shadow regulation is a standard part of most types of development applications, not just in the USA but around the world. This kind of build out is regulated for many reasons: property damage, aesthetics, health, and with a renewed focus: energy use. This includes casting shadows over one’s own property.
- CPLX 3y ago
  I mean actually read it. It basically says shadows don’t really matter much and you barely need to worry about them and then goes on to spell out in very clear detail what happens when they do matter so there don’t have to be moronic lawsuits every time someone wants to build a low rise apartment building.
  - garbagewoman 3y ago
    Not sure who you think you’re arguing with
  - jfoutz 3y ago
    I'm not sure I understand - https://sfplanning.org/resource/shadow-analysis-procedures-and-scope-requirements https://sfplanning.org/resource/shadow-analysis-procedures-a... 40 feet, times of year, 20% shadow. make a model. At the surface level, they look similar to me. NYC has been doing that for a whole lot longer, I wouldn't doubt their planning department has a more refined process. But it's not like SF is alone in this kind of regulation.
    - bobthepanda 3y ago
      My understanding is that NYC * has smaller time requirements for sunlight; the planning requirements state that an area should have 4-6 hours of sunlight a day, whereas SF looks at if it gets any worse over any time period * NYC only protects specific kinds of park uses for sunlight, so like sunlight is not material for a basketball court, for example.