4 ms·
I wonder about using this with a hamburger menu as a form of progressive enhancement? You would still use a hamburger menu that requires CSS and/or JS (it can
by pseudosavant 3y ago
I wonder about using this with a hamburger menu as a form of progressive enhancement?
You would still use a hamburger menu that requires CSS and/or JS (it can be done in just CSS). You'd have that same content in the footer of the page. For the JS disabled people, you'd have a `<noscrip><a href="#footerburger"></noscript>` at the top of the page where the hamburger would be. So if a user clicks on it, it will jump to the footer that contains the exact same content as the hamburger.
- rerdavies 3y agoWhat exactly is this constituency of jscript-disabled people? It sounds a bit nuts to me. I can't imagine why I should be catering to them. Asking because I sincerely don't know.
- scotty79 3y agoWell, there are people who disable js to avoid such things as hamburger menus and other js bells and whistles. I had nojs button for a time in case of the pages that are unreadable due to all js and adverisement.
- irthomasthomas 3y agoPeople with impaired vision that rely on screen readers. They may not always have JavaScript disabled, but it's the same effect. They can't hear the navigation options.
- rerdavies 3y agoIs there not some way to annotate menus for people with impaired vision? That seems extraordinarily dysfunctional.