4 ms·
I always considered them mostly synthetic, with some external human-like features. That would change things for me, but I think probably the most interesting yo
by low_tech_love 3y ago
I always considered them mostly synthetic, with some external human-like features. That would change things for me, but I think probably the most interesting you said was the final sentences.
My question to you then would be: how would you know for sure that a transistor/digital ”being” is actually suffering, and not just mimicking human suffering in order to fulfill whatever internal cost-minimizing process it follows? And by the way what does it even mean to suffer, concretely and unambiguously? For example, a breakup or a job loss causes people to suffer, but certainly we are not going to prohibit them.
And what if we make them unable to feel pain, would it then be acceptable…?
- mcculley 3y agoI don't know that we will be able to tell the difference. I know animals can suffer. Suffering is not limited to what we consider intelligent. I have no idea where that line is. I do not see why the capacity to suffer should be dependent on biology. re: Blade runner replicants being electronic versus biological: I think it is clear that the bodies are bio-engineered, but not clear to me if they had implants in their brains.