4 ms·
Because Jack Dorsey may have funded BlueSky, but he's not involved in running it, he's instead focused on Nostr, the web3 answer to the problem. And as for "mi
by Pxtl 3y ago
Because Jack Dorsey may have funded BlueSky, but he's not involved in running it, he's instead focused on Nostr, the web3 answer to the problem. And as for "misinformation" vs "censorship", I think Fox News just demonstrated over $700 million reasons to care about misinformation.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Because Jack Dorsey may have funded BlueSky, but he's not involved in running it Aside from being on Bluesky’s board of directors.
- carlivar 3y agoI'm fine with the courts deciding what is misinformation. That's a huge improvement.