3 ms·
It's been a while since I read it, but I think the cultural revolution served as character development and how the trauma effected some of the characters in the
by bko 3y ago
It's been a while since I read it, but I think the cultural revolution served as character development and how the trauma effected some of the characters in the story. It also served as an analogy for suppressing scientific research. It's something that has been overcome and is (somewhat) overcome in the rest of the book and the subsequent novels from the Remembrance of Earth's Past trilogy.
It's not that people are all good, but they are serious, as are the governments involved. It might be more obvious from books 2 and 3.
Compare that to something like "Don't look up" (humans stupid) or "Avatar" (human bad)
- tedivm 3y agoI guess my point- which I think we're mostly in agreement with- is that the trilogy was really complex, rather than being "humans stupid" or "humans bad" (or even "humans good"). I love my space opera (Peter Hamilton gets my love) but I also love those really good complex scifi stories such as this.