3 ms·
> parent has granted permission for the work The bill itself touches lightly on the problem: parents. One massive example of a potential problem: does the bill
by zamalek 4y ago
> parent has granted permission for the work
The bill itself touches lightly on the problem: parents. One massive example of a potential problem: does the bill protect education at all? The kids learning skills that can make them money is really a fringe benefit when you consider how much money their parents can make. Win, win, for all!
- WillPost4food 4y agodoes the bill protect education at all? Of course it does. The vilification of the bill entirely based on the worse case assumptions is really unfortunate. --- No person under fourteen years of age shall be employed or permitted to work with or without compensation in any work activity. No person under sixteen years of age shall be employed or permitted to work with or without compensation in any work activity during regular school hours, except the following work activities: 1. Those persons legally out of school, if such status is verified by the submission of written proof to the director. 2. Those persons working in a supervised school-work program. 3. Those persons between the ages of fourteen and sixteen enrolled in school on a part-time basis and who are required to work as a part of their school training. --- Knowing that there are educational protections, does that make you feel better about the bill?